Content creation within organisations

Information

Content creation within organisations

Does your organisation produce eLearning content internally? How does it work for you?

Members: 178
Latest Activity: Apr 5

Discussion Forum

Quality Assurance best practice

Started by Joanna Higginson May 31, 2012. 0 Replies

Error launching SCORM content

Started by Heidi Arthur. Last reply by Heidi Arthur May 24, 2012. 6 Replies

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Content creation within organisations to add comments!

Comment by Simon Kennedy on May 23, 2012 at 15:57

In my organisation we have 4 developers including myself. We have set up our own server and are a self directed work team and basically started with 4 desks and the rest was up to us. We use Captivate 5.5 and Smart builder for authoring. We also use Camtasia, Adobe CS5, Logic pro, and other tools to create our own media.. We have developed a system for which courses to design in house and outsource and have only been in operation just over a year.

Comment by Jenni Culverwell on June 13, 2011 at 11:51
Very much appreciate the constructive tips and fully understand about workload.
Comment by Lee Webber on June 13, 2011 at 11:45

Jenni

I'm afraid I've too much work load myself to help as a mentor, however I would definately consider upgrading to V5 of Captivate (around £250 + vat) which has some great new features and effects, plus if you use variables you can develop some very interactive training. I attach a document which gives you 25 ways to keep learners awake EngagingInteractionsForELearning.pdf  which might help to spice up your projects.

 

Lee

Comment by Jenni Culverwell on June 6, 2011 at 16:51

My manager and I have been talking about how the learning design of our internal content creation hasn't really changed that much in the past 4 years - gone a bit stagnant. 

How can I spice it up, be more innovative and create engaging content?  Would this mean new software; we currently use Captivate4, which is good, but are there other 'best in class' authoring tools that we should consider?

I now have the opportunity to work on a new 'compliance' course on Security Information, (high profile but potentially dry content) and would really welcome the opportunity for someone to step forward as an external mentor to suggest, coach, innovate and generally help and inspire me to produce something exceptional.  I want to build my network of others in similar roles in organisations for sharing ideas and supporting one another.  Any takers?

Comment by Lee Webber on May 26, 2011 at 16:31

Jenni

 

I also use Camtasia for simple screen recordings and to produce videos with subtitles. It is simple to use and in some ways does a better job of screen recordings than Captivate which I tend to use for authoring more. Camtasia doesn't offer so many interaction features as Captivate if you are wishign to produce software tutorials, although for screen recording of a process I love it!

Comment by Jenni Culverwell on May 25, 2011 at 13:05

Just to add to the range of questions on this topic, I see no-one has mentioned Camtasia yet. 

Has anyone had experience of it (ease of use/publishing, simplicity of output files, tracking etc)?  

How does it compare to the usual suspects (such as Captivate)? 

Really interested to hear thoughts.

J

Comment by Dave Lawlor on May 19, 2011 at 13:40

Hi Folks,

 

We use Lectora, Captivate, Presenter and have recently introduced Flash and Photoshop training to the ID Group.  We also have the ability in-house to edit audio and video content.

We use Lectora primarily and in some cases will have Captivate loaded to it as an animation.  Captivate is used as the primary program on other courses.  Everything is publised to our LMS in AICC format.  We have used SCORM before but we changed our LMS last Autumn. 

Our training team is small and getting smaller so design, development, delivery and system management is becoming a concern.  Multi-tasking is a requirement as opposed to a nice-to-have!  Our biggest issue at the moment is measuring return on investment.  We are puling ideas together at the moment and once they are in place we should be able to put a good case in place for the Leadership Team.

We used external providers previously but have stopped this mainly because of costs and ability to edit files etc for course revisions. Some quality is impacted but in terms of team development, turnaround and sense of achievement it has major positives.  We are still in a learning curve so watch this space....

Cheers,

Dave

Comment by Dennis on March 11, 2011 at 13:30

Yes - There should be some concerns and I hope you or someone within your organisation is RoboHelp fluent.  I used the software application for 3 years and produced some quality programmes. It's a good beginner's application 

Comment by Susanne Lee on March 11, 2011 at 10:29

Thanks Lee and Dennis for your very helpful comments.

We'll probably go with Lectora since the department that chose it is ahead of us in the purchase process.

When I asked the department rep what they were going to use it for, they said to "replicate" their classroom training. They also reckon they won't need Flash-type software. Should I be concerned?

Comment by Lee Webber on March 11, 2011 at 9:56

Susanne

I use Captivate5 on a daily basis for ALL our e-learning..whether it is software simulations or traditional e-learning courses. Captivate 5 is nothing like the earlier version1 which was primarily a screen recording tool. Version 5 gives you complete control over everything even down to buttons, variables and advanced actions for branching, you can include  flash video and a host of widgets from the market place. You can create randomised question pools and comes with a host of different question types and learner interactions. It has developed into quite a comprehensive authoring tool, but still easy enough to learn.

 

Like everything there is a learning curve to get to know al the features. I have used Lectora but have seem a demo. It also looks quite comprehensive. The main difference I could see was that Lectora publishes out as HTML where as Captivate publishes out the course as a single .SWF flash file which runs inside the browser using flash player.

 

Both packages are SCORM 1.2/2004 compliant. The difference is the price which is around £850 for Lectora and £600 for Captivate.

 

Personally I am a big fan of Captivate but equally I would be happy to use Lectora. In my work area, many of the other forces also use Captivate which makes sharing project files between forces easier.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Lee

 

Members (178)

 
 
 

Members

Sponsor promotion

LSG Sponsors

 

© 2014   Created by Donald H Taylor.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service